He was almost convincing on the previous page, but that nonsense about a single superhuman could have prevailed in a war just lost it. Like there wouldn’t be a superhuman on the other side, dude.
Also, I agree that that guy belongs with Bezos and Musk. Preferably in a nice, comfortable, padded cell.
Last, to see him use the word “scaremongering” reminds me of that passage in a self-help book, that when you throw an accusation at someone, often it actually addresses you.
My thoughts as well. Exactly people like him shouldn’t have any power of decision-making. It’s very visible where that would lead to.
(Ahem. Panel 2: “dictate to how how that power”, panel 3: “the list if benefits”, panel 8: “convincing arguement”. I wasn’t perfectly sure about the last one but my spelling checker complains about it, too.)
“Of course we won’t strip them of their human rights. They’re not human, after all, so shouldn’t have rights”. Yeah, this guy is sketchy as all hell.
He was almost convincing on the previous page, but that nonsense about a single superhuman could have prevailed in a war just lost it. Like there wouldn’t be a superhuman on the other side, dude.
Also, I agree that that guy belongs with Bezos and Musk. Preferably in a nice, comfortable, padded cell.
Last, to see him use the word “scaremongering” reminds me of that passage in a self-help book, that when you throw an accusation at someone, often it actually addresses you.
My thoughts as well. Exactly people like him shouldn’t have any power of decision-making. It’s very visible where that would lead to.
(Ahem. Panel 2: “dictate to how how that power”, panel 3: “the list if benefits”, panel 8: “convincing arguement”. I wasn’t perfectly sure about the last one but my spelling checker complains about it, too.)
thanks man, I appreciate the heads-up – I think I’ve fixed all the pages now